![]() The aperture sights are among my favorites for the balance of speed and precision offered. The length of pull works pretty well for everyone from juniors to giants. It is unusual for even a new shooter not to easily figure out how to function the little guy. Open-top design is easily manipulated by most.Īt a fraction over five pounds, it remains one of the lightest fighting shoulder arms available. ![]() Rotary safety is quickly disengaged by a swipe of the trigger finger while mounting the gun. M1 Carbine’s controls are well laid out for the shooter. It is rare to hear a shooter describe one without the word “fun” popping up in the first or second sentence. For the AR, I went with the one at the center of the recent hysteria-a Bushmaster in M4-style trim, the XM-15E2.įor over 70 years, the M1 Carbine has been heralded for its light weight, simplicity, and ease of shooting. It is as issued with the exception of the post-war addition of the bayonet adapter. The M1 Carbine used in this project was an Inland CMP gun manufactured in 1943. I wanted to see just how the Carbine stoked with modern defensive ammo compared to a basic M4-pattern AR. Hornady’s recent introduction of their excellent FTX bullet in a tailored Critical Defense. Since then the veteran has largely been forgotten. I knew several trainers who had advocated the Carbine in a home defense or patrol rifle application before the absolute proliferation of M4-style ARs that we currently know. A variety of longtime M1 Carbine owners probably had a similar question as lines formed at gun counters. ![]() I began to kick that question around at the height of the recent AR buying frenzy. 30 Carbine maintains a significant weight advantage over even the light M4-style ARs. Both long guns are comparable in overall length when AR stock is extended for use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |